By Bahar Gidwani
Our friends at Climate Counts have just released their 2011 Scorecard. It is the fifth time they have reviewed the climate and environmental performance of a number of leading corporations—they scored 136 companies this year on a number of different climate-related measures.
Climate Counts has earned wide respect for its careful and thoughtful measurement approach. When we started setting up our CSRHUB database, they were one of the first groups we reached out to for advice, and their approach to measuring climate performance had a big impact on our methodology. We showcase their 2010 data on our site (http://www.csrhub.com/alter/flag/CLC) and were able to incorporate their information into 117 of our ratings in 2010. It looks like we’ll be able to use their data to help us rate 119 companies, this year. (Climate Counts rates some private companies—including some in special interest areas such as baby equipment.)
We took a quick look at how well our scores match up with the new Climate Count scores. We currently have 457 different environment-area measurements from 53 of our sources. They contribute 1.2 million data points to our environment category ratings. (We have a total of 7.5 million data elements in our system, from about 135 sources). We were pleased to see a very strong 75% correlation between our Environment category rating (which includes resource management, environmental reporting, and climate change performance) and the Climate Counts score (which includes data on whether or not a company reviews its climate position, commits to reduce its climate effect, has an appropriate policy, and reports its policy).
We rarely see more than a 25% or 35% correlation between our scores and any single source of data. The strong relationship continues even when we drop down a level of detail and compare a subscore like the Climate Counts “REPORT” rating to our “Environmental Transparency & Reporting.”
We plan to offer more analysis of this update to one of our most-trusted data sources, in a future blog post.